Powered By Blogger

Thursday, 22 May 2014

Catholic Ecumenism in Sweden

The following is an account by Matthew J. Milliner, assistant professor of art history at Wheaton College of his visit to Sweden, the remarkable moves to Christian unity and the growth of the Catholic Church there: 
It’s 4 a.m. and I’m in an eighteenth-century Swedish castle that has been transformed into an ecumenical monastic community run by Pentecostals. I gather my bags and descend a grand staircase, past family portraits going back generations, past neo-­classical statues, past Coptic, Russian, and Greek Orthodox icons—their candles still flickering from the night shift. Then past a well-stocked patristic library, down another enormous flight of stairs, and through a foyer. 

. . . . Still making my way to the exit, I pass a picture of influential theologians gathered on the castle steps a century ago. They include Gustaf Aulén, author of Christus Victor, and Lutheran Archbishop Nathan Söderblom, an ecumenical pioneer who worked with Catholics to revive devotion to Bridget of Sweden, one of Europe’s patron saints. In the same image is the grandmother of the woman whose life, nearly a century later, would be changed by the Jesus People USA and Pentecostal Christians—sufficiently changed that when the Ekman family decided to give up this castle in the 1980s, it was donated to Swedish Pentecostals. Continuing the ecumenical spirit, the castle, now known as Bjärka-Säby, hosts Coptic, Catholic, and Evangelical Christians as well. The precision and beauty of their prayers rival the liturgical exactitude I have witnessed on Mount Athos.

. . . . Two mottos govern: Ora et labora (“pray and work”) and Esse non videri (roughly, “to be and not to be seen”). The man now smiling down a long hallway, gesturing toward me, lives them both. He is Peter Halldorf, Pentecostal minister, renowned writer, and the spiritual leader of the castle. Bearing a white beard, black cassock, and prayer beads wrapped around his wrist, his eyes radiate with life as if he’d been up for hours. He wants to show me something before I depart for my flight.
Down we go into the castle’s basement depths—through yet another hidden passageway—entering the subterranean bakery. “We call it Bethlehem,” Peter proclaims. “The house of bread,” I reply, proud of catching the reference. He pulls out the key and we enter the tiny kitchen. On the table are a Coptic icon of Mary and her son, two candles, and two Swedish Psalters. It is Sunday morning, and two members of the community will shortly be appearing to pray the Psalms while Peter and an assistant bake the Eucharistic bread for that morning’s liturgy.
With a luminous smile, Peter shows me the Coptic Orthodox seals that will shortly be imprinted onto the bread. There are twelve crosses in the center of the seal, eight on the outside and four in the middle. These delineate the holiest area—the Bread of the Lord (Asbodikon). Unlike in the Greek Orthodox liturgy, which uses a ceremonial knife, the Coptic ceremony, emphasizing unity, does not cut the bread—though it is indented and ceremonially pierced five times—once in each corner of the four central crosses, and once in the center, signifying the five wounds of Christ.
. . .  outside the pilgrim entrance to the monastery church of St. Bridget of Sweden (1303–73) in Vadstena, just an hour drive from Bjärka-Säby. A cousin of the Swedish king, Bridget married at thirteen and bore eight children. Following the death of her husband, the revelations she had received since her youth intensified. Faced with the corruption of the Avignon papacy, she even predicted an eventual Vatican State, foretelling almost the exact boundaries delineated by Mussolini for Vatican City in 1921. Bridget—or Birgitta as she is known in Sweden—left her homeland and travelled to Rome, Jerusalem, and Bethlehem, sending back precise instructions for the construction of the monastery I am now entering, known as the “Blue Church” after the unique color of its granite. Birgitta insisted that the abbess, signifying the Virgin Mary, should preside over both nuns and monks.
As we approached the Blue Church I saw some ruins, and braced myself for another case of the stripping of the altars. Like England, Sweden went Protestant during the Reformation. But the Lutheran pastor who met us there was not the steward of an ­empty shell, but instead oversaw a living devotional site frequented by Protestants and Catholics alike. (It does not hurt that Birgitta’s forceful critique of the papacy led some to see her as proto-Protestant.) 
. . . . Although there was some destruction and damage to statues from invading Danish soldiers, most here have survived. We make our way to the still-preserved relics of Birgitta, but are interrupted by a bell. Thirty pilgrims stop to gather in the rear of the church for a Taizé prayer service before a gorgeous Byzantine icon of Christ made by that same Pentecostal painter.
. . . . Martin Luther may have called her die tolle Brigit, “crazy Birgitta,” but there was her body—enclosed in a red casket, now tastefully tended by Lutherans. Nevertheless, leaving Birgitta’s monastery, we visited a recently constructed Benedictine convent populated by onetime Lutheran women who converted en masse to Catholicism. The abbess looked herself like the imposing statue of Birgitta we had just seen. “We converted to build bridges, not to burn them,” she told us matter of factly. She has visited Bjärka-Säby castle several times, and knows Peter Halldorf well. The abbess proudly boasted of the recently acquired relics of Sts. Benedict and Edith Stein—a piece of her veil—installed in the altar at the dedication. After returning home I learned that some of the bridges she hoped to build have already been constructed. My Wheaton College colleague Sarah Borden, an Edith Stein specialist, keeps a relic from the very same veil in her office.
Back at the castle, after a scholarly symposium with Swedish theologians who had gathered for the weekend, the group of us walked the grounds of Bjärka-Säby. Tensions should have been high in this group of Protestant and Catholic scholars. The week before, Sweden’s most influential charismatic pastor, Ulf Ekman (no relation to Hedvig), had announced his plan to convert to Catholicism. The group included the young theologian Benjamin Ekman, Ulf’s son, who preceded his father into the Catholic Church. The group also included Joel Halldorf, a Protestant theologian and son of the Pentecostal abbot.
Adjourning from our walk, we entered the main foyer and saw on the table an article covering Ulf’s conversion, with quotes from Swedish Christian leaders, including some of those present, responding to the news. There were some misquotations and typos, and the group laughed it off. What was causing a scandal for the rest of Swedish Christianity did not so much as ruffle the bonds of these friendships, and while global Christians speculated as to what caused Ulf to convert, those closest to him were reluctant to pry.
 . . . . whereas American Christianity is a mile wide and an inch deep, Swedish Christianity is an inch wide and a mile deep. Never have I seen ecumenical cooperation as I have here. I unfurl a grand analogy: Under secularism’s tectonic pressure, the continents of differing traditions are drifting closer together. As the landmasses merge, some jump to another side, while others remain. But the merging of continents is far more significant than isolated bounds, however athletically impressive. Personal conversions, despite the attention they can generate, are small change compared with the payoff of broader ecclesial union. And toward this goal, Sweden—thanks to the remarkable Bjärka-Säby—seems decades ahead.






. . . .I enter the castle one last time and make my way through the winding hallways to my room, past portraits, past statues and flickering icons. I didn’t know it then, but I was walking over Bethlehem. “And if the priest be skillful and well taught after the elders,” reads one of the Coptic rubrics, “he shall break the Eucharistic loaf (qurbanah) regularly until it be broken yet remain whole, and he shall raise it with his hands broken yet whole, and this is also good.” I pack and sleep. I have to be up at 4 a.m.   
The full article may be accessed at: "Not so Secular Sweden"

Tuesday, 20 May 2014

A Visit to Madonna House

It has been a great joy to visit Madonna House (MH) in Combermere  once again.  Over nearly forty years my wife, Jane, and I have had the privilege of sharing, from time to time, in the life of this remarkable Lay Apostolate which includes within its ranks many priests and associates.


I will not try to recount the history of the foundation of MH by Russian baroness Catherine de Hueck Doherty with her husband, a Melkite Rite Catholic priest, Fr. Eddie Doherty, from its humble beginnings in the 1940s. Let me refer you to the MH website and links to the history, various publications and ministries that MH has developed over the years and around the world.

MADONNA HOUSE
The original MH Main House, modified through the years but largely the same.
I have been making a brief retreat at Carmel Hill staying in the MH St. John Vianney priest's residence. MH welcomes priests for short or longer stays (one priest from Denver is here for two months). Over the years MH has also kindly extended hospitality to Anglican priests some of us having now come into full communion.

As a priest in full communion I have, for the first time, been privileged to concelebrate Mass with the MH community over the past few days. At least one priest here, a former Anglican,  also celebrates the EF Mass regularly. We are hoping that he may be given faculties to celebrate the Ordinariate Use Mass when Ordinariate groups visit.

In addition to the Novus Ordo and EF weekday Mass, some with Eastern chants, the community celebrates the full Byzantine Rite Mass in English monthly on Sunday.  For the first time this past Sunday (fourth after Easter on the Eastern calendar) I concelebrated this liturgy in the Island Chapel of Our Lady of the Woods.
Our Lady of the Woods, MH, Combermere, Ontario

Interior of Our Lady of the Woods.  The Latin altar is moved for the celebration of the Byzantine rite.
To concelebrate this Mass in this way is truly to enter into another dimension of the Holy Eucharist. It is the understanding of the Eastern Church that we participate in the eternal liturgy whenever we celebrate Mass. This deep spirituality is made manifest when the people of God worship through this profound, historic and deeply communal rite.  

I cannot really express how different my experience was concelebrating the Byzantine rite with the MH priests compared compared with my previous impression of the rite. The iconostasis or screen which displays icons beyond which is the altar and tabernacle is not a barrier, as I had thought, but rather marks the entry into the glory of the liturgy.  By means of the several processions and entrances we are drawn into the gospel proclamation, offering, blessing and sharing in the holy communion of the Body of Christ.

The flow of the liturgy from chant to prayers with constant use of incense and signing of the cross (touching the floor as one makes the sign) engages all the senses as well as the heart and the entire body. The liturgy, even in its English translation, links one to the East and to the timeless past in a truly indescribable but very immediate way.

Much more to reflect upon as I thank those back home for their prayers and assure them that they were and are in my intention at the Divine Liturgy which never ceases.
A.J. Casson's painting of Kamaniskeg Lake, Combermere, ON





Monday, 19 May 2014

Blessed John H Newman: Conscience, Synods, the Magisterium and the Press

In light of Pope Francis’ recent call for a synod on the topic of the human family and his statements about the need for dialogue this week, it is worthwhile considering the questions of conscience and the Magisterium or teaching authority of the Church in light of dialogue that takes place within the Church and wider commentary in the press and elsewhere.

One of the least understood parts of Catholic doctrine is the role of the Pope in defining doctrine.
 On the first centenary of the death of Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, Joseph Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) made the following comments in an address regarding Newman's clarifications on the teaching office of the Bishop of Rome and individual conscience. 


‘Conscience and Truth’, was the title of his address presented by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to the bishops of England and Wales:



It was from Newman that we learned to understand the primacy of the Pope. Freedom of conscience, Newman told us, is not identical with the right “to dispense with conscience, to ignore a Lawgiver and Judge, to be independent of unseen obligations”.

Thus, conscience in its true sense is the bedrock of Papal authority; its power comes from revelation that completes natural conscience, which is imperfectly enlightened, and “the championship of the Moral Law and of conscience is its ‘raison d’être’ . . . . This teaching on conscience has become ever more important for me in the continued development of the Church and the world.

Newman had become a convert as a man of conscience; it was his conscience that led him out of the old ties and securities into the world of Catholicism, which was difficult and strange for him. But this way of conscience is everything except a way of self-sufficient subjectivity: it is a way of obedience to objective truth.

Newman’s teaching on the development of doctrine ... I regard along with his doctrine on conscience as his decisive contribution to the renewal of theology.

The characteristic of the great Doctor of the Church, it seems to me, is that he teaches not only through his thought and speech but also by his life, because within him, thought and life are interpenetrated and defined. If this is so, then Newman belongs to the great teachers of the Church, because he both touches our hearts and enlightens our thinking.
 
Newman's private oratory.
At the tenth workshop for Bishops, in Dallas, Texas, in February 1991, the then Cardinal Ratzinger stressed the fact that Newman‘s life and work could be described as “a single great commentary on the question of conscience”:

Newman was much more taken by the necessity to obey recognized truth than his own preferences – even against his own sensitivity and bonds of friendship and ties due to similar backgrounds . . . . He emphasized truth’s priority over consensus, over the accommodation of groups. I would say that when we are speaking of a man of conscience, we mean one who looks at things in this way.

A man of conscience is one who never acquires tolerance, well-being, success, public standing, and approval on the part of prevailing opinion, at the expense of truth . . . In this respect, Newman is related to Britain’s other great witness of conscience, Thomas More, for whom conscience was not at all an expression of subjective stubbornness or obstinate heroism. He numbered himself, in fact, among those fainthearted martyrs who only after faltering and much questioning succeed in mustering up obedience to conscience, mustering up obedience to the truth which must stand higher than any human tribunal or any type of personal taste. ... Conscience cannot be reduced to social advantage, to group consensus or to the demands of political and social power.



During an ‘Ad Limina’ in February 2010 Benedict XVI said:

In a social milieu that encourages the expression of a variety of opinions on every question that arises, it is important to recognize dissent [from Church teaching] for what it is, and not to mistake it for a mature contribution to a balanced and wide-ranging debate.

It is the truth revealed through Scripture and Tradition and articulated by the Church’s Magisterium that sets us free. Cardinal Newman realized this, and he left us an outstanding example of faithfulness to revealed truth by following that “kindly light” wherever it led him, even at considerable personal cost.

Great writers and communicators of his stature and integrity are needed in the Church today, and it is my hope that devotion to him will inspire many to follow in his footsteps.


As we approach the synod on the family it is important to understand how the Church evaluates contributions in light of Scripture, Sacred Tradition and reason. The role of the Magisterium in defining doctrine which is then articulated for the consciences of the people of God by the infallible authority of the Bishop of Rome is indispensable i.e. the assurance of the Holy Spirit that the Church will not "fall" into doctrinal error.

Pope Benedict was greatly influenced by the life and teaching of Blessed John Henry Newman and so was obviously delighted to beatify him while indicating that the Church might one day name him a Doctor of the Church.

In an interview published in’ 30 Days’, January-February 2006 the interviewer asked Alfred Läpple, Joseph Ratzinger’s seminary advisor:  

‘You were then already a student of Newman. Was it you who transmitted to Ratzinger an interest in the English cardinal-theologian’.

Alfred Läpple: 

Newman was not a topic like any other, he was our passion.




Monday, 12 May 2014

HOMILY FOR EASTER 4 A - THE GOOD SHEPHERD STM - TORONTO

“I am the good  shepherd, says the Lord, I know my sheep and my sheep know me.”


In today’s Gospel, Jesus is seen as the Good Shepherd, sent to the people of Israel who were like sheep without a shepherd ( Numbers 27:16-17). However, the Gospel proclaims that he is sent not only to the children of Israel, but to all those far off - whoever wishes to hear the voice of Jesus, the Good Shepherd, the Messiah.

In the first reading we heard St. Peter preach – He [Jesus] is the “Lord,” the divine Son that David foresaw at God’s right hand (Psalms 110:1,3; 132:10-11; Acts 2:34).  What does it mean today that Jesus is the Messiah that God had promised to be shepherd of his scattered flock?  (Ezekiel 34:11-14, 23; 37:24).

The call of the Good Shepherd leads us to the healing waters of Baptism, to the anointing oil of Confirmation, and to the table of the bread of life and the overflowing cup of the Eucharist, as we sing in today’s Psalm. In other words, we belong to God and belong to and are called to care for each other and all others.

Today we hear the voice of the Good Shepherd calling us his own. He awakens in us the response of those who heard Peter’s preaching. “What are we to do?” they cried.

Individually we are to be baptized but despite our incorporation into the Body of Christ, each of us goes astray like sheep, as we hear in today’s Epistle, and so we always need to repent and to seek forgiveness for our sins in the Sacrament of Penance.

We need also to commit ourselves to the flock, to those with whom we share the road to salvation as the baptized community. The ministry of the Good Shepherd is committed to us, the holy Catholic Church of Christ ministering throughout the world.

In the Gospel we hear Jesus say: “I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.”


As the community of the Good Shepherd then, we are part of the oldest still existing organization in the history of humanity – the Catholic Church. In the name of the Good Shepherd the Church has established the first schools and schools in many places around the world for boys and girls of every race, nation and culture. The Church today educates more people on the planet than any single organization.

Likewise in health care and aid to the suffering. No organization provides more health care or emergency relief as well as ongoing care for the poor and the suffering than the Catholic Church. We need to proclaim this truth to the secularists who would downplay and undermine the leaven that the Church is in worldwide society.

It means that we have been and are committed, for example, to the education of girls and young women. From the time of St. Marie de L’incarnation of Quebec (whose relics we are privileged to revere and pray in the presence of) the Church has been engaged in the education of young women and men.  An Ursuline nun St. Marie co-operated with the local shepherd of the flock in New France, her bishop and now fellow saint (as of April this year), St. François de Laval, first Bishop of Quebec.

This is not simply a recounting of history. These are those who, like us, are baptized into the life and ministry of the Good Shepherd. They have helped to shape the education, morals, virtues and the constitutional structure of our nation and the Western World.

“I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.”

They are responsible, with us, for the principles upon which we gather with others to resist the likes of Boko Haram and Al Quida (the wolves of our day which threaten the flock) those who kidnap and murder young women who simply want the freedom to learn.

It is often the Catholic Church that first stands with girls and young women even before governments commit to their aid. It is the Church that is the first in and the last to leave situations of disaster proclaiming the love of the Good Shepherd, standing with and often suffering with those in jeopardy – note the priests and nuns kidnapped and killed while staying with their people in the horrors of Syria today.

We are called to follow in the footsteps of the Shepherd of our souls. By his suffering he bore our sins and the sins of others and he calls us, in penitence for the evil that threatens our brothers and sister, to act with him in shepherding the poor and the needy and welcoming all who will be baptized into the community of the Good Shepherd. 

Jesus’ suffering is also an example for us that we need to learn patience in our afflictions and in those of others, to give ourselves over to the will of God seeking how we may do the work of the Good Shepherd for the most vulnerable.

Jesus has gone ahead, through the dark valley of the shadow of death. On his Cross he has become the gate of the sheepfold through which we must pass to reach His empty tomb - the pastures of life in the kingdom of the Good Shepherd.

“I am the good  shepherd, says the Lord, I know my sheep and my sheep know me.”


Sight, St. Paul and the New Evangelization - A Homily at Newman Centre, Toronto

Annanias lays hands on Saul (Paul) for healing.
In the reading from the Acts of the Apostles today we hear again the story of St. Paul in his encounter with the risen Christ.  I want to think with you for a few minutes about what happened after the famous event on the Road to Damascus and what we call the New Evangelization in our day.

Following his encounter with the risen Christ, Paul was blind.  In Damascus he had a dream that someone would come to him and lay hands on him “that he might regain his sight.” No doubt he hoped that the person – identified as Ananias – would really come with some news of hope and bring to him some kind of healing so that Paul might recover his sight.
 
Chapel of Saul's healing, Damascus, Syria
Addressing  those present for his Mass in the Vatican’s Saint Martha guesthouse this week, Pope Francis spoke referring to the importance of evangelizing – i.e. sharing the news that Christ has defeated the power of death and that we need not live in fear but with the vision, the sight of God’s kingdom for which we work and in which is our eternal hope. 

It is a vision that must be shared. Just as Ananias was the instrument of Paul’s healing by the laying on of hands in prayer and by sharing with him how Saul the persecutor (now Paul) was called to evangelize others for the risen Lord.  Ananias was evangelizing Paul, incorporating him into the Evangel, the good news of our healing and salvation, through the power of the risen Lord.



Describing how it is God calls us into relationships with people, Pope Francis said this week: “You can’t evangelize without dialogue. It’s impossible. You must begin from where the person comes from,” he observed, “this is so important.”



Listening to people sharing their blindness or sin or sorrow will allow you to be an agent for the healing of the Holy Spirit and helping to incorporate them into a community of grace and healing.

Stating that some might say, “But father, we waste so much time because every person has his or her own story, he or she comes with their own ideas,”  Pope Francis’ responded: “Spend time with that person because that person is who God wants you to evangelize,” Then he added that its important to share our own understanding of the risen Lord. We must share with  them “according to who he or she is, not how they should be: [but] how he or she is right now.”


Continuing, the Holy Father encouraged people to think about three “moments of evangelization,” naming them as:

+“the docility to evangelize, to do what God is requesting,”
+ “secondly, a dialogue with people”  beginning from where these people find themselves.


+ “And thirdly, trusting in grace: Grace is more important than all the bureaucracy [of the Church].”

Above all Pope Francis urged: “Spend time with [each person you encounter] because that person is who God wants you to evangelize."
 
The Gate of St. Paul, Damascus

St. Paul was brought to healing through the evangelization of Ananias who spent time with him in his blindness until Paul found sight and healing – then he himself became the great evangelist.    Thanks be to God.


Homily at Friday noon Mass, May 9, 2024 
St. Thomas Aquinas Chapel, Newman Centre, Toronto