Leonard Cohen had a profound respect for Jesus and for Christians.Here is a thought he expressed about the
Peace of Christ:
“As I understand it, into the heart of every Christian,
Christ comes, and Christ goes. When, by his Grace, the landscape of the heart
becomes vast and deep and limitless, then Christ makes His abode in that
graceful heart, and His Will prevails. The experience is recognized as Peace.
In the absence of this experience much activity arises, divisions of every
sort. Outside of the organizational enterprise, which some applaud and some
mistrust, stands the figure of Jesus, nailed to a human predicament, summoning
the heart to comprehend its own suffering by dissolving itself in a radical
confession of hospitality.”
Fr. Raymond de Souza, whom I had the pleasure to drive to the train after he addressed our Ordinariate Clergy and Clergy wives Assembly in Niagara last month, has some insights into the political situation south of the border.
The following is excerpted from an article of his published this week by the NATIONAL POST:
One hundred years ago this month, after nearly 68 years as emperor of Austria-Hungary, Franz Joseph died, leaving the throne to his grandnephew Charles. The last ruler of the Hapsburg monarchy had a short reign, the liquidation of his empire and the abolition of his royal house being among the terms of peace that ended the First World War. Driven into exile, he died in Madeira before his 35th birthday.
Marriage in 1911 to Zita
Charles was a holy man who understood that he had a duty to serve his people and to work assiduously for peace. In 2004, he was beatified by Pope John Paul II.
This election day in the U.S., the witness of Blessed Charles is a reminder that holiness and high office are not incompatible, and that great power can be a means of humble service. That he reigned a century ago is also a reminder that history is not a matter of progress, for the descent of man, and woman, from Blessed Charles to Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, is steep and stomach-churning.
. . . the service that Trump has rendered was to expose just how nasty the establishment culture of entitlement is in America, of which the Clintons are both exemplars and experts.
The Economist has spent the entirety of 2016 expressing the exasperation of the transatlantic establishment, which believes that Americans have been insufficiently appreciative of Clinton. After all, the “establishment politics that Mrs Clinton encapsulates almost to the point of parody” is what voices like The Economist think, on balance, is a good thing.
. . . it is also true that, in Hillary Clinton’s 40 years in public life, she has mastered the art of prevarication. Her husband, possessing greater charm, preferred the brazen lie. Nevertheless, despite the cataract of untruths that cascaded from Trump, he did tell one truth over and over again: America’s political establishment could be bought and sold. He knew this because he had bought and sold it himself, while attending to his celebrity properties.
Trump ran for president having held no public office. A lacuna to be sure, but surely as troubling is the permanent political class, which does nothing but trade public offices. The Clinton family business of personal enrichment through public office is odious, but by no means unique. It has become something of a norm, but no one has done it better, or for as long. To hear Clinton and her ilk speak of public service is nauseating, unless it is to be understood as the public servicing her family.
Yet this is the way the permanent political class operates. They decide who is in and who is out, and whatever arrangements need to be made to protect each other. When Trump blasted the Clintons last summer for having a man as repellent at Anthony Weiner in their inner circle, it was one of many ways in which the privileges of the political class were finally being called into question.
. . . It took a wealthy man entirely outside the normal partisan apparatus to say what no one in the imperial court is permitted to say — namely, that the system is corrupt, and that the Clintons, seeking the White House a quarter-century apart, are this generation’s most corrupt couple.
Hillary Clinton, with the connivance of the partisan and media establishment, the co-operation of a politicized justice system and resources accrued from rapacious influence-peddling, will have heaved herself over the finish line for the presidency as she always has: within the rule, but just so. Trump changed the rules in 2016 . . .
Fr. Hunwicke offers an historical and contemporary
reflection on holy relics as we continue this month to remember those who have gone before
us in faith.
I rejoice in the facility of offering the Holy Sacrifice on
an Altar sealed with Relics; it is a relief to be able to be ecumenical, to
conform to the consensus of the Latin West and the Byzantine East, that one
should sacrifice over, as it were, the tombs of the martyrs. If a custom was
good enough for the shell-shocked Church which in the fourth century emerged,
metaphorically, from the catacombs with an overwhelming sense of being
surrounded and supported by a great crowd of witnesses, martyres, then that
custom is good enough for me. Even if the post-conciliar Church has gone a bit
soggy on relics. I commend to those whose breviaries contain the old Appendix
pro aliquibus locis the fine collect and the superb reading from S John
Damascene they will find on November 5.
Not that the veneration of relics is as late as the fourth
century. The contemporary account of the martyrdom of St. Polycarp, the disciple
of St. John, embodied in the Encyclical which his Church at Smyrna sent to
theCatholic world in the middle of the
second century, links the desire of the faithful for his relics with the
doctrine of the Communio Sanctorum, the Communion of Saints: "they hoped
to koinonesai* with his holy flesh". So, although the hatred of the local
Jewish community drove the Romans to burn his body, his people gathered up even
the ashes and placed them where they could meet for Mass annually on the
genethlion* of his martyrion*, for a mneme* of those who had proathlekoton* and
the askesis* and preparation of those who were going to bear witness.
Most immediately pre-conciliar local calendars made today,
November 5, the Feast of the Holy Relics; according to Sarum it was on the
Sunday after the Translation of St. Thomas, i.e. in July; at Exeter on the Monday
after Ascension Day.
Greek key: *share fellowship with; *birthday; *act of
witness=martyrdom; *monument; *previously competed as athletes [a regular term
for martyrdom]; *training. [I cannot restrain myself from two catty comments:
that the current post-conciliar Roman regulations do not permit the use within
altars of such relics as the tiny fragments gathered up by those who loved S
Polycarp; and that, for sola Scriptura people, Acts 19:12 appears to encourage
the use of Secondary Relics; and II Kings 13:21 the use of Primary Relics.]